Sunday 18 November 2012

Television, Audiences and cultural studies

Bismuth
Outcome of last posting was I have spoken to SE regarding what to pursue next in terms of my research..it was suggested that I continue to read (lit review) as you know not an element I feel comfortable with but will have to get on and do! I've just read through my paper for Module: Project Management and System Thinking DE0949 together with Gantt Chart...the reason for this is I want ascertain where i have come from and where I need to go to next. Hence the title above I've decided to take another perspective and that is to look at audience studies, I  may have hinted on this in blog posting discussing Thomas Struth. 
Television, Audiences and Cultural Studies, David Morley draws on a body of empirical (experimental, observational) work to examine the emergence, development and future of television audience research. Further it looks at articulating private and public spheres of experience in social organisation of space, time and community. Looking over methodology I have pointed out that this is an area much considered to cover...what interested me (p1 introduction) was Morley quote, 'of returning over and over again to the same old questions about cultural power, sometimes reformulation those questions in different ways, and at various points shifting the angle of vision from which the questions have been asked'...This is something i plan to do, I guess it is matter of reframing the question many times to establish  where new meaning could possibly emerge??
to confirm...audience work is normally put into two areas a) is not passive, but active and b) media content (Important rather than where it is being watched or where) is polysemic (a sign, word of phase that contains lots of meanings) and open to many different interpretations. the question posed here is what these assumptions are taken mean and there theoretical and empirical (observations) consequences are..? Evans (1990) 

P 177. Ang (1989) raises the essential question of what kind of knowledge empirical research on audiences can produce. in short, what are the politics of audience ethonography? she continues to insist that doing research is itself a discursive (moving from topic to topic without order ) practice which can ever hope to produce historically and culturally specific knowledge's which are the result of equally specific discursive encounters between researcher and informants. Research is thus, from her point of view, always a matter of interpretating, (or indeed constructing) reality from a particular position, rather than the positivist approach of assuming that a correct scientific perspective will finally allow us to achieve the utopian dream of a world completely known in the form of indisputable facts.
P186. according to Hammersley and Atkinson, ethonography can be understood as...one social research method,...draws on a wide range of sources of information. The ethonographer participates in peoples lives for extended period of time, watching what happens, listening to what is said, asking questions...collecting whatever data is available to throw light in the issues with which he or she is concerned.

ongoing...not sure where this is going but opening the window as SE states and seeing whats out there...I think I need to get an up to copy of this book 1992 is it publish date...so much has happened since then in terms of how we watch tv, new tech advances, means we can basically watch anywhere, anytime...the tv does not keep us situated in time and place we now I guess keep it for when we please???

Finally I started with the 1st year students an assignment based on conversations and how random they are in may different situations...there is no outcome set for this just to consider the creative process. Ideas and how they can be extended upon and in what method etc etc. however this has proved difficult for the students to grasp, it is clear that they don't understand what is expected of them? not being able to settle on something and see it through is also problematic and finally they are not excited..I plan to talk to them this week and look to iron out issues,  go through assignment and initiate tasks. I also want to work towards a small public exhibition to ascertain if that will fire them up??? shall let you know.

signing off

Sunday 4 November 2012

Full Circle

Royal National Hotel 2012 - View from window 
I think when I began writing this blog was from student London trip (October 2011)...I have reached full circle, but this time a year on. So what has filled my life since last posting, July I believe...well I wrote my final paper for Bridging module, which I can tell you I passed, so if I decide to bail out of the PHD I will receive an MA in Design Practice. I haven't confirm yet whether or not I will do this...ummm for one I have put on hold till next September 2013 (already noted in last email) but also I have not done anything since writing paper?? I think once the OU stuff is out of the way, I shall be able to concentrate more clearly, or am I just making excuses...if I have time to read a book then I should have time to set aside for study. BUT where do I begin?????? SE has been intouch and asked me to plan a meeting to discuss with him future aims. Perhaps talking to him will put me back on track, reading my paper again would be a good idea. Something to note is that I have asked the 1st students to concentrate on the creative process only, that is not to produce any final outcome, just lots of ideas. I feel that they have had difficulty in getting started I don't think its so much as the assignment brief itself, but getting them use to working more independently and being playful with their ideas, so that one leads to another?? I shall record how this progresses over the next 7 weeks, their journals will also be a good way to find out what they have been thinking and how they have dealt with problems, situations etc etc...
Ok returning to the point of full circle..(View from Window) this was taken as a random photo, where i was testing out the camera in my room before heading out into London (Oct 9th-12th)..I really like this image, why? because I like the way the curtains frame the picture, the curves formed within the building beyond work with the verticals and horizontals of the slightly open window and finally the contrast of browns help also to decide the depth..ummm. would be good on a large scale. Right onto visits. YES Thomas Shutte..very similar to Thomas Struth (discussed in July's posting) don't get confused this artist currently showing at the Serpintine Gallery was an exciting and influential find. The beautiful pen and ink portrait drawings drawn in large circles...I shall find one now to upload...back in a tick! ok here's a couple of images mirror image, the other,  installation view with faces and figures hung high around it....caption taken from webpage..Over the last two decades, Schütte has created watercolours and drawings of acquaintances and friends, as well as numerous self-portraits, including the Mirror Drawing works. His drawings are often created in series, approaching the same subject numerous times as a means of engaging with its true nature. Schütte's drawings feed closely into his sculptural portraits, which are created in a similar spirit; the artist views working from observation as an opposition to a real, physical world that is constantly changing. Alongside his works on paper, Schütte will feature ceramic and bronze sculptures, including the impressive Vater Staat (Father State), a towering steel figure that paradoxically appears frail and isolated in spite of its scale. 
Thomas Schütte
Mirror Drawings 1998 
Watercolor, ink, pencil on paper
38 x 28cm
© DACS 2012
Thomas Schütte
Vater Staat (Father State) 2010
Installation view, Thomas Schütte: Faces & Figures
Serpentine Gallery, London
(25 September - 18 November 2012)
© 2012 Gautier Deblonde
Another excellent exhibition was Art of Change: New Direction From China exhibited at the Hayward Gallery, very different in terms of the way work was being shown, from installations (note: Yingmei-duan) to stories..taken from webpage..http://china.southbankcentre.co.uk/artists/#chen-zhen and http://china.southbankcentre.co.uk/artists/#yingmei-duan large-scale installations and extraordinary live art by some of China’s most innovative artists, in works dating from the 1980s to the present day. Art of Change traces each artist’s development, showing important early works alongside recent creations and new commissions. Change, and the acceptance that everything is subject to change, is deeply rooted in Eastern philosophy. The exhibition features works that deal with transformation, instability and impermanence, looking at how these themes are conveyed through action or materials.
Each of the artists presents works that change their appearance over time or which are volatile or unpredictable in some way. A person ‘magically floats’ above the floor, sculptures are wilfully tossed up and down, and visitors can listen to the sound of 1000 live silkworms. The exhibition itself changes as performances are enacted with various works during the course of each day.
Artists in the exhibition include Chen Zhen, Yingmei Duan, Gu Dexin, Liang Shaoji, Sun Yuan and Peng Yu, Wang Jianwei, Xu Zhen and MadeIn Company. The exhibition is curated by Stephanie Rosenthal, Chief Curator, Hayward

http://vimeo.com/southbankcentre/artofchange 

Duration:27 May 2011 – 28 May 2011
Lilith Performance Studio in Malmö, Schweden
Extract taken from http://www.yingmei-art.com/works/imgsmall/wish.jpg  

This is Yingmei Duan’s second experience working with the Lilith Performance Studio.
Through a small doorway one-steps into Duan’s poetic fairytale wonderland, which is enacted in a forest glade. In the forest glade one hears different sounds like wind, water dripping and Yingmei herself is crouching down on a tree stump she is also sometimes making sounds…..
Yingmei is going(but slowly) and handing out many wishes which are written on small folded pieces of paper, which she opens and gives to the audience making eye contact and carefully one by one.
Some wishes/instructions involve interacting with each other, some wishes involve the space others will be realized out of the gallery. Some wishes will realized in the city of Malmö, others will be realized outside Sweden, and some wishes will be realized online. Therefore after the night of the performance the project continues.
Happy Yingmei is inspired by Oscar Wilde’s fairytale The Happy Prince – a story about a golden statue that befriends a swallow. Together they bring happiness to others, in life as well as in death.
Previously in May 2008 Yingmei Duan staged a dystopian catastrophe titled Rubbish City at Lilith Performance Studio. Even then she put herself and her dreams at the centre of the performance, lost in a wasteland of ten tons of rubbish.

Ok at last Im happy that I have spent time writing again...as I said I shall make an appointment with SE this week (wc 5th Nov) to get going again, write about development of 1st year activity...and there was something else I wanted to add but I have lost my train of thought..bear with me Im sure it will come???? no..ok shall sign off for now..

no haha I've remembered. Last week (or before Half term) DB from Hull College of Art and Design told me that they had John Smith in as a visiting speaker!! and I missed it..??? bum! but he says not all is dismay as I can get hold of the recording which I shall locate this week. let you know. Definitely signing off now..



Saturday 21 July 2012

Decisions, decisions...

Thomas Struth
Since I last wrote I have made the decision to stop my studies, I've spoken to SE about how to proceed...sooooo on the recommendations given of BY and KH he advised that I complete my MA and suspend until September 2013 after work load has calmed down, (validation - re-writes for BA's) SE thinks that my research is good, my theory is good and I can get the PhD! so I must stick with it...ok so now its the holidays I have made a start, I need to work on lit review and methodology with footnotes. The lit review concerns me as it brings back horrible memories of when I started the doctorate and received a foul mark, a mere pass as I recall, so I need to up my game, I also want to get into the habit of reading and reviewing as an on-going habit; thereby I don't end up having to review stuff again when the time come to writing the thesis!! (AS does this well). Reviews I need to do- Warhol, Robin Wood on Hitchcock, Hilliary Lloyd, Pierre Bismuth, Raimer Strange in particular who interviewed Bismuth and new find Thomas Struth*  The methodology will be ok, think through with a clear perspective and standpoints from others in the field.. 


The above film shows the work of Thomas Struth from early career to 2011...


Text taken from http://artnews.org/gallery.php?i=211&exi=6227 April 2007
Being close to this essentially private painting is something like going back to one’s emotional home’…. It means establishing an urgent relationship with the passage of events, with the existence Struth is asking himself about from his camera lens. Because deep down, a museum is a circumstantial stage, a place like any other that the artist doesn’t perceive with its connotation: there, he offers a straightforward view of the procession of people, those that gradually gain more presence in [his] work. … This parade of types... are new and concrete inhabitants of the metropolis. In Struth’s museum, a historical line is drawn that transcends all those who live in the instant: that, too, is existence.” TS


Signing off back tomorrow...

Saturday 7 July 2012

3 days in London

Invisible: Hayward Gallery 2012
..ok lots has happened since I last posted. AS and I took a trip to Northumbria University to meet and with BY and discuss 4 - 6 sessions (i think??) that we had missed in a space of a day...!! the surprise was KH said that the Design Doc would not be continuing in the foreseeable future so we have the option to continue and finish it or take the PHD route either practice based or theory...this is not bad news for me as the practice element of the Doc has always thrown up issues for me, so I am PHD (theory) all the way; but ha ha that is if I can get through this last module which I might also has the PA attached to it...oh god if only you could help me now...show me the light, guidance etc etc etc...
Anyway I have done so far my learning outcomes (draft) these I have gone through with SE  (Supervisory session Tuesday 3rd July) who actually thought they were good. Ok so now I need to reconsider my aim: taken from Report on progress Module: DE0935 

I perceive the creative process to function as a historical temporal proposition that’s intention is to interpellate the spectator into wanting to watch. Moreover it performs as a ‘conceptual narrative’ (Figure 1 & 2) (what I likened to the notion of the washing machine, Blog dated 29th March 2012) that by putting the ‘artist, Strange (2005 p125) behind the idea and the viewer called on to participate in it’ will circulate the flow and exchange of ideas to encourage one’s horizon to change direction over and over again until there is no more use for it.
My aim then is... to examine and explore the notion of conceptual narrative as a model to a framework new discourse surrounding the creative process to student audience...
that sounds about right  ?     
Objectives: to be able to...
a. apply methods of mapping, research templates, journal entries and blog to build upon a discursive understanding of material gathered to strengthen hypothesis as research develops towards final thesis    
b. review literature associated to notions underpinning conceptual narrative theory by identifying a grounded theoretical standpoint to establish own contribution to new knowledge
c. design and develop a conceptual narrative model to acknowledge possible new modes of communication between the act of making performed by the artist (i.e. student) and student audience. 
d. examine visual culture, specifically concepts framing film theory, audience studies and psychoanalysis. Intended to establish alternative perspectives towards structuring conceptual narrative model in practical situations.  
e. employ 'live' studio situations to test notions led by b & d literature review anticipated to underpin and confirm conceptual narrative model 
f. provide and maintain peer review offered by research communities and communities of practice to expand upon and develop standpoint relating to conceptual narrative model and its contribution to new knowledge.    



There I think I may have it..shall forward to BY Monday if I get the chance, or possibly tomorrow however there seems to be a problem with logging on both email sites currently?? now that I have some sort of systematic order I can now focus on the methodology and lit review (the two areas that bother me and not confident in). Referring back to SS with SE (which I have recorded and type up, just about) he explained that I must confirmed on d, what are those areas exactly because they along with b need to determine c and e. are you keeping up here??
lastly on this I have looked at calendar to days I can effectively work on module...must get on with it and organise time in which I can safely sit down and pull all stops. My theory is if I can do well on this part and don't make it through to viva at least I've had a damn good go at it rather than just going up..and I would have completed the MA part of it too.


So to London, I went down to attend AA2A briefing Wednesday 4th July at Wellcome gallery, euston rd...good day, I met LH from Hull who is the administrator for Artist in residence scheme at Hull but will also look after Harrogate, I shall coordinate. Next week I will begin to send out emails, thinking about PG as a potential candidate! Thursday and Friday I attended the BFI creativity, learning and teaching conference, enjoyed this alot! I was hoping for new perspectives to work into my RQ, which in some ways I got, if anything it allowed time for me to reflect, talk to others, listen to disciplines in photo, film and writing...of particular interest was Ben Marsden (ITV researcher audience studies) I asked him about psychology behind AS, he suggested that I looked at Account Planning Group, David Ogilvy and Roy Langmaid. Ronan Bennett discussed clarity, structure, character building..throwing in the ingredients and seeing what comes out, meaning not to have a defiant focus of how something is going to end but to have an idea...further to throw in obstacles (can relate this to forming an argument) to make the narrative more exciting (i.e. toy story) grab the viewers attention at the beginning and then slow down. this relates to Tony Lawson (film editor) who spoke about pace, (I refer to forms of writing..shall look up memesis?? ummm no not it, its when writing is used in detail (slowed down) and then speeded up (no detail used) must look up??? tomorrow. He mentioned clarity in work, needs to be clear when considering ambiguity (Ambiguity of information, in words, pictures, or other media, is the ability to express more than one interpretation. It is generally contrasted with vagueness...)  
Films to watch..Butcher Boy and In Dreams (Nick Rode films I think)

Thursday 14 June 2012

...at last, I'm back!!

BA / FdA EOYS Invite 2012


Its been just over 2 months since I was last here and you ' dear blog' have had a make over too ummm...
So what's new, or more to the point what have I not been doing reference Doc stuff??? oh dear not a lot, but I shall come to that shortly. The past couple of months has seen assessment period, external examiner (who offered me a post in Plymouth!! but I have not heard anything since so that's that) build up of HE show and PV (great success) and further the build up of FE show and PV (again another great success-met the major no.? Ive lost count)....and yet another external examiner yesterday, since then we have received a no. of texts from students wanting to know there final grades for FMP. Next week and beyond will host 2 sits of exam boards, 1 period review and staff development...I'm worn out thinking about it and you ask; why do I sit here explaining all this? Well I firstly wanted to explain my long absence and secondly I'm trying to make myself feel better for understanding the vast amount of work I do have on; which unfortunately means that the doctorate will endeavour to always come second to everything.

We, that is, AS and I are now working on the bridging module. DE0949 project management and Systems Thinking with B Young. BM started 3rd May and hand in is 28th June2012. However due to time constraints with lots of activity going on (for which I have explained above) AS and I are going up to Northumbria University Friday 22nd June to meet and discuss with BY our submissions to Viva, which basically is what the BM is all about. We have been given 2 examples of viva's which look pretty straight forward, note here I say that with such confidence????
I need to get on with it now...look at my objectives for the next 3 years, which I guess I have (need to extend upon however) looking at the obs the examples present, SN in particular, I felt had far to many, 10 objectives?? Im surprised she wasn't asked to (what's the word??) make them more to the point, no..arhh yes condense them down. Anyway I need to do that, look at a methodology, who is my audience that the research will serve most..as B Young suggests; pedagogical,  educationalist or student theoretical prop? could express a set of theories, simple way to support learning. I must also set up another meeting with S English, I had to cancel last session as working, note here to myself that last meeting with SE (10.5.2012) he feed back final mark to 'Report in Progress' (I received (D-good stuff!) needed to be more accessible to supporting links, all the underpinning stuff that feeds into paper I believe...I think this is quite difficult as a distant learning but I will take SE observation on board. Last word on this issue of openness,  is I did start to build a website...but was then weary of making work public...so reverted to 'dropbox', I guess I will need to give that more thought if my research is accepted at viva stage.
Further to the above, that is meeting with BY, I'm hoping that we will get some sort of an extension at least July? Must ask K.       

Ok some good news and what I hope to be beneficial to RQ, is that I hope (as not booked yet) to attend BFI conference, London 4th - 6th July 2012. There are some good talks being presented, in particular Friday..further I want to meet some like minded people, it will be a bit adhoc (taking a risk here) as film is not my specialist area, however what I'm trying ascertain is to look at the RQ from another perspective...will see! 

Last word is to Karen Thompson http://karent.co.uk/ who I met last weekend whilst helping AK at his Open Studios in Scarborough.  I bought this piece...thanks Karen! 

Karen Thompson 2012











Sunday 1 April 2012

The End??


yesterday (Sat 30th march) i watched Alfred Hitchcocks 'The Birds' on reflection the film displayed many hidden meanings, that I have since followed up further by reading robin woods (Hitchcocks films revisited faber faber 1989) review on the film. my first thoughts was why the birds actually attacked people?? apperantly there is none, woods suggests (p153) that the film is insistent that either the birds cant be explained or that the explanation is unknown' and refers to the murder in Psycho it being of no dramatic, symbolic or thematic justification. The importance of the film then is quite simply the fragility of human relationships, that is between melanie (who spends the whole 3/4 days in the same clothes and heels...) and mitch, the mother (who seems possessive almost incestuous relationship with her son), mitches ex girlfriend (the school teacher who lives close by to stay near to mitch, because she still loves him) and cathy, mitches sister (who accepts melanie immediatly). What interests about this film is the dramatic landscape of  Bodega Bay, the scretching of the car as melanie makes her journey from san fransico to see mitch, the comical close up that show the back view of the love birds (in a cage placed on passenger floor) moving side to side as the car moves quickly around bends. the close up shots of their faces as melanie looks at mitch and vica - versa (we are caught up in the act the camera seems to go directly from one to the other as they look straight out of the screen to us the spectator and beyound). there is a strange scene in which melanie stands over mitches mother whilst she picks up the broken crockery (after a bird attack in the house) the camera seems to stay there watching melanie watching the mother almost as if its forgotton to move away, the camera, or we are for that moment fixated with her stare, what was she thinking about? woods describes this as a (p163) resemblance between them  (in the beginning of the chapter woods likens melanie to mitches mother in 30 yrs time) and states that 'the scene is the clearest possible visual communication of the unspoken questions'; 'has life any purpose?' for her for the mother...the film ends with i guess, no real ending, only open to questions to what happens next, the whole family leaves the house surrounded by birds who seem to let them through, thus signifying a sense of hope? woods describes the carrying of the lovebirds by cathy (out to the car) as a continuing act of faith, despite all that has happened, or a refusal to face reality, whatever the answer, Hitchcock leaves us to work it out ourselves...i believe their is a sequal to this film, but I think Id rather stay with this film where there is no ending only possibilities.

...and today Alfred Hitchcocks 'Rope' (1929). this film is of particular interest to me firstly I read that it was filmed using real time (wikipedia-realtime:For example, if a movie told in real-time is two hours long, then the plot of that movie covers two hours of fictional time) and being edited so as to appear as a single continuous shot through the use of long takes. The walls of the set were on rollers and could silently be moved out of the way to make way for the camera and then replaced when they were to come back into shot. Prop men constantly had to move the furniture and other props out of the way of the large Technicolor camera, and then ensure they were replaced in the correct location. A team of soundmen and camera operators kept the camera and microphones in constant motion, as the actors kept to a carefully choreographed set of cues. This relates clearly to bismuth 'the all seeing eye' in which as the camera rotated (360%) around the room, people came silently and at speed to remove the furniture, so by the end of the film there was nothing left for the viewer to see, all had been erased. watching the film I felt was like being at the theatre, that is, we only see the story being played from the outset in the confines of the living room. at the start of the film we see brandon and philip (the film is based on their earlier influences of looking to prove their superiority over intellectuals) thereby they murder david (a college friend) by strangluation using a rope. (at this point the blinds are closed), they are opened again once david is placed into a chest by which they have give a party and use the chest to entertain from. their guests are made up of davids girlfriend, his father, aunt and their old prep schoolmaster (james stewart). as the story infolds the backdrop (cyclorama) shows a brilliant skyline of the chrysler building, empire state building, apartments and chimney smoke. what is interesting is the light changing from day to night, (clearly links to warhols unedited 8hr film of the 'empire state building' where we see that transition of light to dark played in realtime)  lights start to appear in building as it gets darker outside (very clever), the neon light in the next building comes on though a smaller window to the right side of the living room, you feel that the room is very exposed to the rest of the world due to the openness and transparency of the windows. brandon and philip are also a guess to whether the two are lovers, this becomes clearer when philip breaks down and brandon tells him that he is not his carer (not the right word) the two come clear on the murder when realised by stewart who opens up the chest to find davids body there, he fires a gunout of the window, we then hear sound of people, police sirens etc...on both realising their fate, brandon very calmly gets himself a drink and philip plays on the piano...

thinking in terms of how I want to display my work for the PP module and using influences of bismusth, (im thinking here of the text typing) and watching the hitchcocks films which  have been revelant to research undertaken currently. I want to write my report using (realtime) text typing to show the 'openness' of writing a document, refers to gabriel orozco using openness in 'empty club' 1998, discussed in last posting. but also to show the process unfolding as I write up evidence of research made to todate...the key thing here is there no 'the end', I want to start with current research and then tranfer back to the beginning with the  conclusion feeding back to now. Zizek (looking awry 1991 an introduction to jacques lacan through popoulation culture) chapter 4 'how the non-duped err' states by presenting events in a reverse way, from end to beginning is a version of fetishistic split, 'I know what will follow (because i know in advance the end of story) but i will still watch anyway) the reversal of temporal order (p70) is at every turning point things may have taken another direction. this is perhaps true of the creative process, that fact that we see always the final product (the end) thats it? in most cases (im referring here to education) if  a creative process could be laid out in the same way a script is, would the viewer/participate learn from those turning points? the accidents, the incidents, and challenge it as the work is conceived and so on, furthermore taking it as a point of departure for own use?? this is what i want to attempt with the report in the last 6-8 months I have looked at warhol, hilary lloyd, pierre bismuth, john smith, hitchcock, gabriel orozco...all have had a huge influence on my research with some significant links thereby I will look to convey a 'unmediated (strange 2005 p124) translation of train of thought, a bluntness to reveal the process for what it really is'. I will also attempt to add sound as I write, i have made recordings of bismuth in conversation (BFI) hitchcocks 'the birds', 'rope', 'rear window' I also have conversations with SE and EL. im not sure if this will work and what I plan to test today when finished up here. I may look at using radio 4 as a background noise (with other noises that will no doubt come into play during the day/evening writeups) and as a method of recording of time, (radio 4 present time on a regular basis) the date I will record by means of a journalistc approach.

   

Thursday 29 March 2012

washing machine

'empty club gabriel orozco'
A train of thought reveals the process for what it is...today I spent the morning completing commercialisation module, which is now Im happy to say sent! this afternoon I was meant to be online with SE and EL for 3:30 supervisory session, however nothing happened...unsure what happened?? ok so form there i have spent the rest of the afternoon reading this time on mexican artist gabriel orozco...this thread came from the conversation between raimer strange (BM p144 art critic and exhibition commssionor and bismuth) strange references orozco as an artist who bismuth has interests in because of the open, available nature of his works. what was of interest to me was the term 'circulation system' initially coined by james lingwood. link-''circulation system'' in gabriel orozco, empty club, london, artangle, 1998. It liken to my theory of the 'washing machine' stage, that is, the invisible threshold between the artist and the viewer. lingwood describes as 'a material with which orozco could see in 'play' a series of dualities where the players and spectators in the model lose their identities...they now merge into a scenrio  with unknown rule (the billard table above has no pockets) taken from article..
Right at the heart of this imposing, inanimate building, and at the core of Orozco's project, the visitor encountered a tiny, moving centre. At the centre of a building in the centre of a city which considered itself to be the centre of the world, a red billiard ball hovered just above the green baize of an oval billiard table. Inspired by Foucault's pendulum which, in the 17th century, had given empirical evidence to the proposition that the earth was not the still centre around which the planets orbited, but was itself a mass rotating around the sun, the red ball was a perpetuum mobile. The destruction of certainties implicit in Foucault's exposition was echoed by the construction of the game without its conventional limits and rules. The billiard table's traditional rectangular shape was transformed into an oval. The game was possible, indeed enjoyable, to play, but it was one in which the rules, the scores, the limits had to be rethought or invented. The movement of the balls, like planets in the cosmos or atoms in a demonstration of the laws of physics, fractured the silent suspense of the sleeping building: the sharp retort of the white ball cracking against the red, setting the pendulum in orbit around and beyond the limits of the table, set many of the ideas informing the conception and realisation of Empty Club in motion.
this confirms the notions of 'play'. Oscillates-to move back and forth, the the input from the artist behind the idea and the viewer called in to particiapte in it. A good example i read here was orozco 'parking lot' in which he opened an art gallery as a parking space to any passing motorist...'the anonymous (guy brett 1998) motorist and symbolic car slip into the role of the 'protagonist' by crossing the 'threshold' between one context and a another, which are as much mental and physical, maybe invisable to one person as they are loaded with meaning to another...'

lastly..looking over writings from last year, i.e. paper and then referring to current thinking...i can confirm that it is not the creative process as a process i am dealing with here, but the looking in on that process, I guess in the same was 'rear window' is viewed, the spectator being impassive to the situation because he/she use mechanisms to speed up of slow down what it is to be viewed but participate as one they share common ground with the artist and or the creative process and two the material realised will be reinterpreted in a new way. the washing machine (circulation system) allows for this because it is a continuation and 'open' to a train of thoughts given originally from the artist onto the viewer...a temporal act that continues on and on..

  


 

Friday 23 March 2012

a day of Alfred Hitchcock...

Yesterday I spent pretty much of the day watching films suggested to me...I think they were suggested? I say that  because I can't exactly remember who did suggest those films?? Anyway nevermind the important thing is I watched two Alfred Hitchcock films; Rear Window and Vertigo....I want to  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rear_Window concentrate on 'Rear Window' which touches on the notion of the voyuerist, or perhaps more scopophilia, (yes) the pleasure of looking, but always maintaing a distance (links to warhol). briefly the story is about a professional photographer (played by James Stewart) who having a leg in plaster spends the summer looking out of his window onto a court yard and other apartments. The apartments he gazes into is key here...we see 'torso girl' (a dancer), 'lonely hearts' women (forever enacting romantic situations), a pianist, a young married couple (who spend most of the time with the blind down) , a couple with a dog and the a sales person and his ill wife (who stewart believes has murder his wife?). all can be seen as representing the veiwers own life. robin wood (hitchcock revisted p102) suggest that 'we tend to select from a film and stress, quite unconsciously those aspects that are most relevant to us, to our problems and our own attitude to life, and ignore the rest...he continues that we tend to use such id again, usually unconsciously as a means of working out our own problems in fantasy form. what is also interesting is that stewart  (stella calls him ''a window shopper'')sees what he wants to see, that is, he is not interested in the happy family or the young couple, he is more interested what reflects his own life the fact that he is not happy in his relationship etc is viewed a parallel to that of the salesman and his murdered wife?. we as spectators from the outset of the film only see what he does, he is then in control...I guess this could link to being an impassive spectator living up to the expense of what the camera will allows us to see

...center on the relationship between Jeff and the other side of the apartment block, seeing it as a symbolic relationship between spectator and screen. Film theorist Mary Ann Doane has made the argument that Jeff, representing the audience, becomes obsessed with the screen, where a collection of storylines are played out. This line of analysis has often followed a feminist approach to interpreting the film. Doane, who used Freudian analysis to claim women spectators of a film become "masculinized", pays close attention to how Jeff's rather passive attitude to romance with the elegant Lisa changes when she metaphorically crosses over from the spectator side to the screen: it is only when Lisa seeks out the wedding ring of Thorwald's murdered wife that Jeff shows real passion for her. In the climax, when he is pushed through the window (the screen), he has been forced to become part of the show.
Other issues such as voyeurism and feminism are analyzed in John Belton's book Alfred Hitchcock's "Rear Window".
Rear Window is a voyeuristic film. As Stella tells Jeff, "We've become a race of Peeping Toms." This applies equally to the cinema as well as to real life. Stella invokes the specifically sexual pleasures of looking that is identified as exemplary of classical Hollywood. The majority of the film is seen through Jeff's visual point of view and his mental perspective. Stella's words sum up Hitchcock's broader project as film maker, namely, to implicate us as spectators. While Jeff is watching the rear window people, we too are being "peeping toms" as we watch him, and the people he watches as well. As a voyeuristic society, we take personal pleasure in watching what is going on around us...

Vertigo
Vertigo also played by James Stewart is a story about an ex policeman who suffers from acrophobia. An old friend asks him to tail his wife, which he does but in the process falls in love with her. 
The next day Scottie follows her to his house and they decide to spend the day together because Scottie fears Madeleine might commit suicide. The two travel to muir woods where Madeleine, embarrassed from confessing that her dreams sound mad, runs to the ocean and they kiss. Upon hearing the details of her nightmare Scottie identifies the setting as  mission san Juan Bautista and takes Madeleine there where they proclaim their love for each other. Madeleine suddenly runs into the church and up the bell tower. Scottie, halted on the steps by vertigo and paralyzing fear, watches as Madeleine plunges to her death.
An inquest declares Madeleine's death a suicide but Scottie feels ashamed his weakness has rendered him incapable of preventing someone's death. Gavin does not fault Scottie but in the following weeks Scottie becomes depressed. While treated in a sanatorium, he becomes mute, haunted by vivid nightmares. Although Midge visits, his condition remains the same. After release, Scottie haunts the places that Madeleine visited, often imagining that he sees her. One day, he spots a woman who reminds him of Madeleine. Scottie follows the woman to her hotel room where she identifies herself as Judy Barton from Kansas. Though initially suspicious and defensive, Judy eventually agrees to join Scottie for dinner.
After Scottie leaves Judy has a flashback revealing she was, in fact, the woman known as "Madeleine," but she is not Gavin's wife. Judy writes a confession letter to Scottie explaining she was an accomplice to the real Madeleine Elster's murder by Gavin, and how Gavin had taken advantage of Scottie's acrophobia. She rips up the letter and decides to continue the charade because of her love for Scottie.
Scottie remains obsessed by his memory of "Madeleine" and their similarities. He transforms Judy until she once more resembles Madeleine. Judy agrees to change on the chance they may finally find happiness together. Scottie realizes the truth when Judy wears a unique necklace that he saw in the portrait of Carlotta Valdes. Instead of dinner, Scottie insists on taking Judy to the Mission San Juan Bautista.
There, he reveals that he wants to reenact the event that led to his madness, admitting that he now knows Madeleine and Judy are the same. Scottie forces her up the bell tower and angrily presses Judy to admit her deceit. Scottie reaches the top, conquering his acrophobia at last. Judy confesses that Gavin had hired her to pose as a possessed Madeleine; Gavin faked the suicide by tossing the body of his already-murdered wife from the bell tower.
Judy pleads to Scottie to forgive her because she loves him. The two embrace when a nun emerges from the trapdoor; startled, Judy steps backward and falls to her death. Scottie stands on the narrow ledge while the nun rings the mission bell.

After watching the films in particular 'Vertigo' I read a conversation between Bismuth and Michael Newman, who discussed how in films such as Bond movies, somebody always gets killed in the beginning and then the story unfolds to how that happened...this made me think about the how we see the final product as perhaps being 'The End' like in films, the creative process being the journey leading up to that end. ..I need to look up mark cousins who lectures on closure??? this is a 'superfluous' act, that is, there should never be a full stop, an ending not with a creative process, as it is temporal in that it is handed down over and over again...
later in the conversation Bismuth states' in most cases they (the consumerist) position themselves as cultural consumers, outside the creative process, whereas in fact they should consider themselves as the potential creator of the work'..  
'the messenger or story is less important for the construction of a narrative than the way we look at things' Bismuth

to be continued...






Sunday 18 March 2012

The all seeing eye...


This week I have spent time researching more on the French artist Pierre Bismuth...Ive become obsessed!! this has lead me to finding a recording hosted at BFI (2008) here he discusses his work in detail i.e. Postscript, The all seeing eye (seen above) etc. The all seeing eye shows subtraction as a metaphor for a world without communication and relationships (the orginal idea came from a friend of his who had had sex with someone whom she wanted to forget about because it was so bad, Bismuth played on the notion of  erasure, specific details etc). In the film a room is stripped bare, the not immediately apparent visual erasure taking place creates a moment of displacement in the spectator compapable to the feeling experienced when a memory is lost, desite its strengh and against ones
(www.bfi.org.uk/audio/exhibitions/bismuth.aif) will, simply by means of time passing. The All-Seeing Eye interestingly is taken from the Film 'External Sunshine of a Spotless Mind' (Bismuth & Michel Gondry worked collaboratly together on and as a result received an 'Oscar' award) Bismuth decided to take the notion futher by using it as an art piece that involed another collaboration between the two.

(Bismuth describes the work as a theatre set model in which the camera is a rotating apparatus working at 360 degrees...people had to come in, ahead of the rotating camera to remove objects...he says the film was full of suspense, because everybody had to be quiet with no room for shadows..) 

He speaks further of Gondry and his use of appyling the camera as another way of looking at reality...accident/inccident...'how' could it be used in practice. I thought this could work in terms of filming my reflective practice, that is, hesitation, pause, typing thoughts and erasing them and so on and so on... 

Interestingly he talks consistly of 'perception' and how subtraction is a link to a private relationship , that is 'see and don't see'. I guess it is the same as i sit here typing im in control of what I want to see, something that the spectator will not be envolved with unless I show it..maybe?Bismuth discussing that he uses films because they are readily available, a ready made object..brings attention to the public He considers the link between his music and cinema...the unfolding, (listening to it) the duration (important elements)

Relates to Warhol in that he is not interested in editing..prefers the duration and the idea of 'ready-mades'. How we put meaning on something. How do we percieve, consider the direct relationship between you and the world.
talks about Hitchcock 'Vertigo' considers end of film shown at beginning...and then subsequently the journey leading up to event..Im thinking here about Columbo...will come back this ?
To think about Postscript..I want to explain that the sound track is given to a secretary (she has not seen the film) she describes the soundtrack and (writes dialogue) it is shown like subtitles. she percieves and selects by creating through something she is describing...her actions she is centre of attention. she is now the artist. Perceiving something is a creative act because you have to make a selection in what you are looking at, remember somethings and not others.

Bismuth talks about John Smiths film 'Girl chewing gum' (1976) a structural film. 12 mins B/W. sound 16mm. 'in the girl chewing gum a commanding voice appears to direct the action in a busy london street. As the instructions become more absurd and fantasised, we realise that the supposed director (not in shot) is fictional. he only describes, not prescribes the events that take place before him. smith embraced the 'spectre of narrative' to play word against picture and chance against order.

Theres some intestering links to what I looked at above, in particular 'perception' has come up again, it occurred to me that I had over looked this when looking over old recording templates, I did not think to look back over journals...back in a minute. Back... Ive just look over some old notes from last year and I did cover perception..even coming up with the notion of perceptual thought...which of course is not new! this is what I wrote at that time.. 19.6.2011

The particpant interprets ideas communicated by the storyteller. The participant uses his/her imagination, memory or intuition in cognition to form new meaning and understanding. I think this is perceptual thought? Where the participant brings the illusionary world into existence in order to be able to look at own experience, make connections and reason?? 
I also thought this was interesting to refer back to, in particular the playing out of ideas.(ref to gardemar)

1.Storymaker, i.e. student = becomes story teller by means of communicating to his/her audience their creative process/activity. The creative process/activity is a construct of ideas played out. These constructs of ideas are temporary, because they are performed in the present and will change in time. This is the conceptual part..! 
and this...
The creative process is not thought of in the same as a work of art, that is, a work of art is what it is, it holds its own authenticity, its true meaning intended by its creator. The creative process is the product in which messenger offers an arrangement of parts that seek a whole, it is a product for use that holds no end point except if a solution has been found.   
ok what am I doing with all this, I guess I am trying to build on links...going back to go forward.  I had a supervisory session with SE and EL this week (13.3.2012) good to have Ellies input, interestingly she suggested I look at John Smith...
and then by some coincidence Bismuth makes reference to him?? I think when I speak to SE again I need to ask for guidance..but then I suppose when I write up my evidence in report I hope to confirm some ideas. I still have film to do and IP. the IP I will start this week, will have a look at it anyway and draw up some notes. Im going to finish up by posting up key words...I also sent these to SE and EL. this again needs more depth.

Keywords: spectator, apparatus, performance, creative process, storyteller/source

Keywords